MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415780890 · doi:10.63172/577712hzihas

Vagrant and extra-limital bird records accepted by the Birds New Zealand Records Appraisal Committee 2023–2024

2025· article· W4415780890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Colin M. Miskelly, Andrew C. Crossland, I. D. Saville, Ian Southey, Alan J. D. Tennyson, Elizabeth Bell

Bibliographic record

VenueNotornis · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesShearwaterOrnithologyHistorical recordSeabirdSandpiper

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report Records Appraisal Committee (RAC) decisions regarding Unusual Bird Reports received between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2024. Among the 195 submissions accepted by the RAC were the first New Zealand records of Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo (Chrysococcyx basalis), MacGillivray’s prion (Pachyptila macgillivrayi), and the Asian subspecies of gull-billed tern (Gelochelidon nilotica affinis). We also report the second accepted records of stilt sandpiper (Calidris himantopus), Bulwer’s petrel (Bulweria bulwerii), and dusky woodswallow (Artamus personatus), the third accepted sighting of northern pintail (Anas acuta), and the second and third accepted records of streaked shearwater (Calonectris leucomelas). Other notable records included the first records of Kermadec petrel (Pterodroma neglecta) and brown booby (Sula leucogaster) at Rēkohu/Wharekauri/Chatham Islands, plumed whistling duck (Dendrocygna eytoni) at the Snares Islands/Tini Heke, Canada goose (Branta canadensis) and black shag (Phalacrocorax car

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotornisSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207