MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415781910 · doi:10.3389/frhs.2025.1658656

Community-driven mental health priorities for immigrant youth in Alberta

2025· article· en· W4415781910 on OpenAlexaffabout
Syeda Farwa Naqvi, Mungunzul Amarbayan, Gina Dimitropoulos, Jennifer Zwicker, Maria Santana

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Health Services · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthImmigrationMental health literacyHelp-seekingLiteracyHealth literacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Immigrant youth population is more susceptible to poor mental and overall health due to environmental factors, such as higher risks of poverty, trauma, displacement, and settlement period, learning a new language, adapting to a new culture, and a lack or loss of social supports. The overall goal of this project was to identify the research priorities of immigrant youth with lived experience of mental health concerns to guide research in mental health and inform health policy in a partnership with community organizations across Alberta, Canada. Methods: This patient-oriented research was designed based on the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership five steps: (1) creating a steering committee; (2) gathering uncertainties (questions which cannot be answered by existing research); (3) refining uncertainties through steering committee; (4) prioritization with immigrant youth via focus groups and with stakeholder involved in the care of immigrant youth through a nominal group technique; and (5) finalizing priority setting, report and dissemination. A steering committee was created with immigrant youth who self-identified with lived experience of mental health issues, leaders from immigrant communities (aged 18-25), researchers, non-profit organization leaders, and healthcare or community service providers. The electronic survey was distributed in rural, remote, suburban, and urban settings to recruit self-identified immigrant ("someone who has permanently located in a country other than their place of home origin") youth between the ages of 15 and 25 residing in Alberta, Canada. Results: Based on 148 responses from immigrant youth with a mental health concern, 25 uncertainties were refined. The top five priorities were chosen at the focus groups and NGT. Youth prioritized uncertainties related to them and their communities, while key informants emphasized higher-level uncertainties (resources, institutional barriers). Both prioritized community roles in reducing stigma, schools' role in addressing mental health, and the impact of COVID-related isolation. Conclusions: This study underscores the need for policies that support the tailoring of mental health services to the individual needs of immigrant youth. The findings from this study affirm that immigrant youth recognize mental health as not linear or universal; they seek to support each other and advocate for systemic changes that increase literacy and access to care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Health ServicesSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207