Parametrized statistical appearance and shape modelling strategy to predict proximal and diaphyseal femoral fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Femoral loading leading to a fracture is known to vary with anthropometry, and patient-specific finite element models have provided important insights into fracture prediction but are often very time consuming to generate. Additionally, existing parametric models do not simultaneously account for variations in both femur geometry and bone density distribution and remain limited to either the femoral shaft or the proximal femur. This inhibits their ability to predict fractures involving both the shaft and proximal regions. Methods: In the present study, a novel parametric femur modeling strategy was developed to create whole femur models based on stature, BMI, and age input, including density distribution and geometrical variations, for fracture loading predictions. A statistical shape and appearance femur model was developed based on an input set of CT scans of healthy female femurs (N = 18) between the ages of 50 and 70. Thereafter, multilinear regressions were used to relate principal components to the subject anthropometric characteristics and develop parametric models. The developed parametric models were evaluated using traditional patient-specific models for their potential to represent the influence of changing patient stature, BMI, and age on femoral fractures. Femoral fracture load in three-point bending, axial torsion, and lateral fall cases was predicted using the parametric as well as subject-specific femur models. Results: The developed parametric model was able to predict femoral fracture load variations due to changing anthropometry and age with an average difference of 4.85% compared with predictions using subject-specific models. Discussion: Therefore, this novel parametric femur model can predict fracture loading while directly incorporating the influence of changing patient anthropometry. In the future, the model could support the development of orthopedic devices tailored to specific patient anthropometries to help mitigate femoral fractures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".