Geomechanical Substantiation of the Parameters of the Zhaman-Aybat Field Development System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of geomechanical justification of permissible roof spans of chambers at the Zhaman-Aybat deposit. The actual statistical data and analyses for the primary and secondary extraction of ore reserves are presented. A physical model of the process of destruction of the immediate roof is selected. A calculation scheme has been developed for numerical simulation of the stability of the thin-layered roof of the treatment chambers. The simulation was carried out using the Phase 2 program (RocScience, Canada). The simulation shows the roof stratification due to the difference in the displacements of different layers. Numerical modeling has shown that reducing spans is an effective way to ensure the stability of the roof of the chambers, which, as shown by the 12-year experience of the Jomart mine, is the weakest element of the development system in these mining and geological conditions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it