MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415785810 · doi:10.1051/bioconf/202519300062

Brain Gym Effect On Cognitive Impairment Reduction Among Onion Farmers

2025· article· fr· W4415785810 on OpenAlex
Daru Lestantyo, Baju Widjasena, Hanifa Maher Denny, Suroto Suroto, Siswi Jayanti, Dwi Cahyaningrum

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBIO Web of Conferences · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionWilcoxon signed-rank testTest (biology)Nonprobability samplingCognitive impairmentCognitive trainingExecutive functions

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of insecticides via way of means of farmers incorporates the hazard of long-time period fitness effects. Absorption of insecticides withinside the crucial worried device can result in reduced cognitive function.. The have a look at end up finished on a fixed of farmers in Demak regency, Central Java who actively use insecticides. The goal of the have a look at end up to study the effect of thoughts gymnasium on the prevention of cognitive impairment Organophosphate pesticides are the most common type used in the study area. The research method was quasi experiment with pre and post-test non equivalent group. The independent variable in this study was brain gym intervention , while the dependent variable was the cognitive test score.45 participants in this research were selected by purposive sampling technique from local farmer group. Cognitive function examination was performed using The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) method. These 45 farmers were set to do Brain Gym 3 times per week for 4 weeks. During the test, participants will answer 30 questions that assessed several cognitive domains, namely executive function, visuospatial , language, delayed recall, attention, abstraction and orientation. We find out from this research that group pre test mean (MOCA INA score) result was=21.221 and for post-test was = 23.20. Wilcoxon signed rank test shows ρ=0,0032. Those means that Brain Gym have significant effect on increasing farmers cognitive function. Although cognitive impairment cannot be cured, the provision of brain exercises can reduce the risk of serious morbidity. cognitive domains, namely executive function, visuospatial , language, delayed recall, attention, abstraction and orientation. We find out from this research that group pre test mean (MOCA INA score) result was= 21.221 and for post-test was = 23.20. Wilcoxon signed rank test shows ρ=0,0032. Those means that Brain Gym have significant effect on increasing farmers cognitive function. Although cognitive impairment cannot be cured, the provision of brain exercises can reduce the risk of serious morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it