Brain Gym Effect On Cognitive Impairment Reduction Among Onion Farmers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of insecticides via way of means of farmers incorporates the hazard of long-time period fitness effects. Absorption of insecticides withinside the crucial worried device can result in reduced cognitive function.. The have a look at end up finished on a fixed of farmers in Demak regency, Central Java who actively use insecticides. The goal of the have a look at end up to study the effect of thoughts gymnasium on the prevention of cognitive impairment Organophosphate pesticides are the most common type used in the study area. The research method was quasi experiment with pre and post-test non equivalent group. The independent variable in this study was brain gym intervention , while the dependent variable was the cognitive test score.45 participants in this research were selected by purposive sampling technique from local farmer group. Cognitive function examination was performed using The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) method. These 45 farmers were set to do Brain Gym 3 times per week for 4 weeks. During the test, participants will answer 30 questions that assessed several cognitive domains, namely executive function, visuospatial , language, delayed recall, attention, abstraction and orientation. We find out from this research that group pre test mean (MOCA INA score) result was=21.221 and for post-test was = 23.20. Wilcoxon signed rank test shows ρ=0,0032. Those means that Brain Gym have significant effect on increasing farmers cognitive function. Although cognitive impairment cannot be cured, the provision of brain exercises can reduce the risk of serious morbidity. cognitive domains, namely executive function, visuospatial , language, delayed recall, attention, abstraction and orientation. We find out from this research that group pre test mean (MOCA INA score) result was= 21.221 and for post-test was = 23.20. Wilcoxon signed rank test shows ρ=0,0032. Those means that Brain Gym have significant effect on increasing farmers cognitive function. Although cognitive impairment cannot be cured, the provision of brain exercises can reduce the risk of serious morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".