A multivariate approach to identify association between peripheral blood DNA methylation and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of Alzheimer disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA methylation has been shown to play a crucial role in many diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although many studies have correlated DNA methylation in blood samples with risk of clinical AD diagnosis, few have examined links with AD neuropathology. Using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study, we investigate the associations between peripheral blood DNA methylation and three AD-associated biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid: amyloid-β, phosphorylated tau-181, and total tau using an innovative multivariate approach. In our approach, we first adjusted the methylation values for covariates that have known wide-spread effects on methylation. We then developed and implemented a multivariate penalized model to find associations, jointly, between CSF biomarkers and sets of methylation residuals defined by regions around each gene. These penalized models then selected probes showing associations with one or more CSF biomarkers. We demonstrate, using both simulations and actual data, that our proposed multivariate approach is beneficial for detecting weak signals. We also provide complementary validation using data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Our multivariate strategy has the potential to increase feature selection accuracy among correlated predictors in epigenetic studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".