MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 4357414: Towards More Sensitive Detection of Cardiovascular Proteolytic Signals: A Substrate Phage-Display Based Approach

2025· article· en· W4415789076 on OpenAlexaff
Eugene Yu, Matthew L. Holding, Andrew Chan, Cherie Teney, Colin A. Kretz

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProteaseCathepsin GProteasesProteolysisSerine proteaseNeutrophil elastaseCathepsinNeutrophil extracellular trapsElastase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Dysregulated protease activity is a key early contributor to cardiovascular diseases, with neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) implicated in the pathogenesis of stroke, chronic inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary ectasia. However, detecting protease activity in complex biological mixtures is limited, because current substrate-based probes may lack sufficient specificity and require prior knowledge of protease content to select probes. Objective: Our study aims to develop Deep Protease Profiling as a high-resolution method for the specific and functional characterization of protease activity in mixtures and validate its use with activated neutrophil supernatants. Methods: A random 5 amino acid substrate phage display library was constructed and screened against 3 NSPs: elastase, cathepsin G (CSG), and human proteinase 3 (hPR3). The library was also screened against the supernatant of phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-activated neutrophils alone or in the presence of protease inhibitors. Each condition was conducted in triplicate. Cleaved phages were isolated, and cleaved sequences were identified by high-throughput sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed by adapting algorithms used for RNAseq applications. Results: Substrate specificities for each NSP aligned with existing literature, prior protease screens, and known active site architecture. Proteolysis detected in the activated neutrophil supernatant was attributable to elastase (62%), CSG (22%), and hPR3 (3%). Peptides identified from the purified NSP reactions captured 66% of total activity in the neutrophil supernatants. Deconvolution algorithms objectively captured substrate profiles of >1M peptides to quantify protease activity across neutrophil mixtures, with significantly reduced elastase, CSG, and hPR3 activity identified in neutrophil supernatants treated with AEBSF. Results across two algorithms tested (CibersortX, EPIC) were highly congruent. We further found unique substrates distinct for each protease and classified physiologically relevant cleavage motifs, with validation by MEROPs databases. Conclusion: We demonstrated a global, unbiased, and systematic method of unprecedented breadth to detect and deconvolute protease activity in complex biological mixtures. Future studies will expand Deep Protease Profiling to other proteases, mixtures, and clinical samples, with promise as an emerging platform for developing novel diagnostic tools to manage disease in patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsFrench-language works237,207