Abstract 4368328: Oral anticoagulation for post-operative atrial fibrillation after valvular heart surgery: a population based study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: New onset post-operative atrial fibrillation is common after valvular heart surgery yet optimal oral anticoagulation (OAC) management in these patients is not known. Herein, we describe trends in the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA), direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs), versus no OAC and their outcomes in patients that develop new onset POAF after valve surgery. Methods: Provincial-wide clinical registry with linkage to discharge abstracts was queried to obtain all patients ≥65 years-old undergoing isolated aortic and/or mitral valve bioprosthesis replacement or repair from 2008-2022. Patients undergoing replacement with mechanical prosthesis, history of prior atrial fibrillation or those who died within 90-days were excluded. Trends in utilization of OAC versus none were assessed over the study period in patients that developed POAF within 90-days of surgery. The primary outcome was the composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, thromboembolism, or major bleeding at 2-years compared in a cause-specific hazard model in propensity score matched cohort. Results: In 7,774 patients undergoing valve surgery without a history of atrial fibrillation or OAC use, 3,075 patients (40%) developed POAF (mean age 74 years, 58% male, median CHADS2-Vasc score 4.0 [IQR: 3.0-4.0]). In 1,851 (60%) patients, OAC was started within 90-days of discharge with VKA (68%, n=1,263) or DOAC (32%, n=588) while no OAC was initiated in 1,224 patients (40%). There was decreasing use of VKA (2008: 68% 2022: 23%) and increasing use of DOAC after introduction in 2012 (2012:7%, 2022: 40%) without an overall increase in OAC use with time (2008: 68% 2022: 63%). Propensity matching on 20 demographics yielded 1,187 well matched pairs (96% match). The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome did not differ between OAC and no OAC patients at 2-years (Figure, 8.2% vs 7.2%, HR: 1.17, 95%CI: 0.87-1.57, p=0.3). The incidence of stroke at 2-years was similar between OAC and no OAC (1.7% vs 1.1%, p=0.22). There was no increased risk of major bleed at two years with OAC (3.5% vs 2.9%, p=0.41). Conclusions: The use of OAC in patients with new onset atrial fibrillation after bioprosthetic valvular heart surgery was 60%. The use of OAC did not reduce the incidence of stroke nor was it associated with increased major bleeding in this population. Routine oral anticoagulation in patients with POAF after valve surgery may not be necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".