MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4363460: Depressive Symptoms Predict Sleep-Related Functional Outcomes in Rural Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

2025· article· en· W4415792282 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ashmita Thapa, Jia-Rong Wu, Martha Biddle, Misook L. Chung, Geunyeong Cha, Chin‐Yen Lin, JungHee Kang, Debra K. Moser

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepression (economics)CognitionDiseaseMarital statusDepressive symptomsActivities of daily livingMultilevel modelClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sleep disturbances are prevalent in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and can have a substantially negative impact on daily functioning (e.g., reading, working, driving, and decision-making), also known as sleep-related functional outcomes. However, the relative contribution of demographic and clinical factors, cognitive function, health literacy, and depressive symptoms on sleep-related functional outcomes remains poorly understood. Objective: To examine the influence of demographic and clinical factors, cognitive function, health literacy, and level of depressive symptoms on sleep-related functional outcomes in depressed rural patients with CVD. Methods: We conducted secondary analyses using data from a large longitudinal randomized controlled trial and developed a hierarchical multiple linear regression model in depressed rural patients with CVD (N = 257; mean age 57±13; 47% women). Predictors of sleep-related functional outcomes were entered in five blocks, 1) demographic (age, sex, marital status, financial status), 2) New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, 3) cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment), 4) health literacy (Newest Vital Sign), and 5) depressive symptoms, (Patient Health Questionnaire-9). Sleep-related functional outcomes were measured using the Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire-10 (FOSQ-10). Results: The final model significantly predicted sleep-related functional outcome (R 2 = 0.135, adjusted R 2 = 0.108, p < .001). Among all predictors, only depressive symptoms were independently associated with sleep-related functional outcomes (B = -0.363, p < .001), indicating that greater depressive symptom burden was independently associated with worse sleep-related functioning. Demographic characteristics, NYHA class, cognitive scores, and health literacy were not significant predictors in the final model. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms were the strongest and only significant predictors of sleep-related functional outcomes in rural depressed patients with CVD. These findings underscore the importance of integrating routine mental health screening and intervention, particularly for depressive symptoms, into cardiovascular care to address sleep-related functional outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→