MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 4354457: Environmental Toxic Metal Exposure and Change in the Cardiac Biomarkers among US adults from 2015-2023: A Trend and Mixture Approach

2025· article· en· W4415792955 on OpenAlexaff
Rezaul Karim Ripon, Sujata Saunik, Mayra Volquez, Srikanth Sola, Satish C. Govind, Narayana Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyPopulationCadmiumCholesterolCardiac dysfunctionEpidemiologyLinear regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Toxic metal exposure is a growing public health concern due to its potential long-term effects on cardiovascular health. However, limited studies have evaluated the cumulative effects of metal mixtures on cardiac biomarkers in a nationally representative population. Objective: To examine the association between exposure to a mixture of environmental toxic metals and changes in cardiac biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and total cholesterol (TC) among US adults. Methods: Data are obtained from three pooled survey data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2023, comprising 21730 adult participants. Cardiac biomarkers include CRP, HDL, and TC. Exposure variables consist of blood levels of lead, cadmium, mercury, manganese, and selenium. Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression is used to estimate the effect of metal mixtures on cardiac biomarkers. Trend analysis is performed across NHANES cycles using survey-weighted generalized linear models. Results: The study population has a mean age of 42.1 years (SD: 20.9). Among cardiac biomarkers, the weighted mean (SD) of CRP is 3.46 mg/L (7.06), HDL is 53.95 mg/dL (15.40), and total cholesterol (TC) is 182.64 mg/dL (41.26). For toxic metal exposures, mean levels are lead 0.94 µg/dL (SD: 1.06), cadmium 0.36 µg/L (SD: 0.47), mercury 1.12 µg/L (SD: 1.82), manganese 9.90 µg/L (SD: 3.64), and selenium 2.35 µg/L (SD: 0.35). Trend analysis shows a statistically significant increase in CRP levels over time (p = 0.002), while HDL and TC showed no significant trends (p > 0.45). In multivariable WQS models, toxic metal mixture exposure is significantly associated with all three cardiac biomarker changes. Specifically, a per-quantile increase in toxic metal mixture is associated with a 6.57% (4.00% - 9.20%) increase in CRP levels, a 3.17% (2.47% - 3.87%) increase in HDL, and a 7.01% (6.37% - 7.65%) increase in total cholesterol. Manganese (64.9%) and cadmium (32.2%) have a high contribution in CRP, while lead and mercury primarily influence HDL and TC. Conclusions: Exposure to mixtures of toxic metals is significantly associated with increases in key cardiac biomarkers, including CRP, HDL, and TC. These findings suggest that even low-level environmental exposure may have cumulative effects on cardiovascular health over time. Further studies should focus on longitudinal studies to reduce environmental metal exposure in vulnerable populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→