Jean-Claude Hébert, La Passion de défendre . Montréal, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La prévention de la commission d'une infraction justifie, pour les dirigeants politiques, que l'on puisse recourir à des mécanismes de surveillance ou de probation. L'outil de surveillance que l'on peut observer tout au long de la procédure pénale est le bracelet électronique. Or, on peut relever que d'un point de vue juridique, le bracelet électronique revêt différentes formes de plus en plus variées. La multiplication des formes de bracelet électronique est venue altérer l'analyse originelle de cette technique. La finalité d'insertion ou de réinsertion du placement sous surveillance électronique semble délaissée. Dès lors, cette étude croise les diverses formes de bracelet électronique et tente de démontrer l'affaiblissement de la finalité de réinsertion au profit de nouveaux impératifs pénaux comme la lutte contre la surpopulation carcérale et la surveillance de personnes jugées dangereuses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".