MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415805147 · doi:10.1167/iovs.66.14.2

<i>USH2A</i> -Mutated Human Retinal Organoids Model Rod–Cone Dystrophy

2025· article· en· W4415805147 on OpenAlexaff
Kristen E. Ashworth, Jiajie Zhang, Cassandra D’Amata, Élise Héon, Brian G. Ballios

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenKrembil FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathogenesisOrganoidDiseaseRetinalDystrophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: USH2A mutations are the leading cause of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a progressive blinding disease marked by photoreceptor degeneration. Animal models fail to recapitulate the features of USH2A RP seen in humans, and its earliest pathogenic events remain unknown. Here, we established a human model of USH2A RP using retinal organoids derived from patient induced pluripotent stem cells and CRISPR-Cas9-engineered isogenic-USH2A-/- induced pluripotent stem cells. Methods: We assessed organoids for cellular, molecular, and morphological defects using serial live imaging and whole organoid and fixed section analyses. Results: Both patient-derived and isogenic-USH2A-/- organoids showed preferential rod photoreceptor loss followed by widespread degeneration, consistent with the clinical phenotype. Additionally, isogenic-USH2A-/- organoids showed early defects in proliferation and structure. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that molecular changes precede overt photoreceptor loss in USH2A RP, and pathogenesis may begin before clinical symptoms emerge. By defining early and late disease features, we provide new insight on the developmental origins of USH2A RP to guide therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207