MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415812412 · doi:10.3390/met15111215

Optimizing the Leaching Parameters of Asbestos Tailings for Maximizing the Recovery of Critical Metals

2025· article· en· W4415812412 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Zouhour Rajah, Daphne Freda Gavras, Herizo Andrianandraina, Fariborz Faraji, Mahamadou Traoré, Stéphanie Somot, Faı̈çal Larachi, D. H. Ryan, Ahmed Bouajila

Bibliographic record

VenueMetals · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalImpactMcGill UniversityCentre Technologique des Résidus Industriels
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTailingsLeaching (pedology)MetalResponse surface methodologyMagnesiumHydrochloric acidChromiumCentral composite design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asbestos tailings represent a historical liability in many countries. Canada aims at transforming this industrial legacy into an opportunity to both mitigate the environmental footprint and recover critical (such as magnesium, nickel, chromium, and cobalt) and strategic metals, which represent significant economic development potential. This study aimed to investigate the recovery of critical and strategic metals (CSMs) from asbestos tailings using hydrochloric (HCl) acid leaching, with acid concentration (2–12 mol/L), leaching temperature (20–90 °C), and solid–liquid ratio (10–40%) as key process parameters. The tailing samples studied is composed mostly of chrysotile and lizardite. It contains about 40% magnesium (as its oxide MgO) and nickel and chromium showing contents 52 and 60 times higher than their respective average crustal abundances (Clarke values). Iron content is 8.7% (expressed as its ferric oxide Fe2O3). To optimize key factors influencing the leaching process, a statistical experimental design was employed. The designed leaching experiments were subsequently performed, and results were used to define leaching conditions aiming at maximizing Mg and Ni recoveries while minimizing iron contamination using response surface methodology (RSM) based on the central composite design (CCD). A quadratic polynomial model was developed to describe the relationship between the process parameters and metal recoveries. Among the tested effects of acid concentration, temperature, and pulp density on magnesium recovery, the modeling indicated that both hydrochloric acid concentration and leaching temperature significantly enhanced metal recovery, whereas increasing pulp density had a negative effect at low temperature. The empirical mathematical model derived from the experimental data, accounting for the uncertainties on chemical data, indicated that high magnesium recovery was achieved at 90 °C, with 10–12 N hydrochloric acid and a solid-to-liquid ratio of 33.6–40%. These findings reveal the potential for the recovery of critical and strategic metals, both in terms of efficiency and economic viability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetalsSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207