Enablers, Barriers and Systems for Organizational Change for Adopting and Implementing Local Governments’ Climate Mitigation Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By 2050, the global population will be predominantly living in urban areas, and climate change mitigation planning will be crucial for addressing the climate emergency. Local governments are well-positioned to lead in adopting effective climate mitigation strategies. This systematic literature review examines the barriers, enablers, and systems that local governments will need to consider when implementing climate mitigation and strategies. A search across Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases yielded 411 results, from which 28 articles were selected for detailed analysis. Using Covidence and NVivo 14 software, the study employed a combination of deductive and inductive coding to identify key themes. The study identified themes specific to enablers, such as technology, collaboration, leadership, and management culture, as well as barrier themes, including short-term thinking, uncertainty avoidance, lack of knowledge among decision-makers, resource shortages, and organizational challenges. The findings underscore the importance of addressing organizational issues and allocating appropriate resources to bolster local-level systems change in support of climate change mitigation efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it