MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415813922 · doi:10.3390/vaccines13111130

COVID-19 Vaccination, Hospitalization Rates, and Mortality Differ Between People with Diagnosed Immune Mediated Inflammatory Disease and the General Population: A Population-Based Study

2025· article· en· W4415813922 on OpenAlexafffund
Carol Hitchon, Carole Taylor, Çharles N. Bernstein, Christine Peschken, Diane Lacaille, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Jessica Widdifield, Ruth Ann Marrie

Bibliographic record

VenueVaccines · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversitySunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of CalgaryArthritis Research Centre of CanadaUniversity of ManitobaResearch CanadaManitoba Health
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsVaccinationDiseaseImmune systemIncidence (geometry)EpidemiologyMEDLINERisk of mortality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Vaccination reduces Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection severity. We evaluated COVID-19 vaccine uptake and effectiveness in people with immune mediated inflammatory diseases (pIMIDs) versus the general population. Methods: Using population-based administrative health records, we identified cohorts between 2004 and 2022 with an IMID (rheumatoid arthritis n = 10,405, systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease n = 5888, inflammatory bowel disease n = 7911, multiple sclerosis n = 3665, psoriasis n = 23,948) who were matched (1:5) by age, sex, and region to general population comparators (n = 243,490) without these IMIDs. Between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2022, rates of COVID-19 vaccine administration, hospitalizations with COVID-19 (Hosp-C), and all-cause mortality were assessed amongst pIMIDs and comparators using multivariable models. Results: More pIMIDs were vaccinated than comparators (87.3% vs. 84.7%, p < 0.0001). IMID diagnosis, increasing age, female sex, higher socioeconomic status, urban residence, immunotherapy use, and comorbidities were associated with increased odds of receiving at least two vaccine doses. pIMIDs had higher rates of Hosp-C (79 per 100,000, 95% confidence interval (CI) 77.8–80.2) than comparators (51 per 100,000, 95% CI 50.5–51.3; rate ratio 1.55; 95% CI 1.53, 1.58) and greater mortality [pIMID 1758 deaths, 3.61%; comparators (6346 deaths, 2.61%), RR 1.39 95% CI 1.32, 1.46)]. In multivariable analyses, vaccinated status was associated with less Hosp-C (OR 0.27, CI 0.23, 0.32) and death (HR 0.27 CI 0.24, 0.29); the association did not differ between IMID and comparator groups. Conclusions: Although COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of Hosp-C and death in both pIMIDs and comparators, pIMIDs remained at higher risk for both. Since SARS-CoV-2 is now endemic, these findings may inform ongoing vaccination recommendations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVaccinesSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207