MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Acolhimento e inclusão social de imigrantes haitianos em Florianópolis (SC): perspectivas psicossociais

2025· article· pt· W4415814754 on OpenAlexaff
Giovanna Botini Zortea, Lucienne Martins Borges, Allyne Fernandes Oliveira Barros

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Katálysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQualitative researchWork (physics)PoliticsOrder (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo O cenário nacional aponta um aumento de atravessamento de fronteiras por sujeitos que buscam melhores condições de vida. Essa realidade promove implicações individuais e coletivas, pois afeta pessoas, comunidades e a geopolítica global. Este ensaio teórico tem como objetivo discutir as condições de acolhimento e inclusão social proporcionados a imigrantes haitianos no território brasileiro, especificamente na região da Grande Florianópolis, a partir de uma revisão teórica. Para tanto, este artigo discorre seus pontos centrais a partir da contextualização histórica das políticas migratórias no Brasil; o cenário da diáspora haitiana rumo ao país de acolhimento e suas particularidades; e, por fim, as condições de inclusão social e reparação psíquica no âmbito da região de Florianópolis. Com a discussão apreende-se que as medidas de enfrentamento de cunho psicológico, social e político endereçadas a essa população mostram-se deficitárias em território nacional, culminando em poucas estratégias de enfrentamentos que tornam-se efetivas em longa duração, especialmente as de acolhimento e inclusão social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista KatálysisSame topicMigration, Racism, and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207