MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415815234 · doi:10.1364/optica.567002

Integrated optical-to-optical gain in a silicon photonic modulator neuron

2025· article· en· W4415815234 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua C. Lederman, Yusuf O. Jimoh, Y. Wang, Simon Bilodeau, Eric C. Blow, Bhavin J. Shastri, Paul Prucnal

Bibliographic record

VenueOptica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhotonicsArtificial neural networkBenchmark (surveying)AmplifierBlock (permutation group theory)Modulation (music)Silicon photonicsSignal processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon photonic neural networks can achieve higher throughputs and lower latencies than digital electronic alternatives. However, recently reported implementations of such networks have lacked integrated signal gain, instead utilizing off-chip amplifiers or co-processors to complete the signal processing pipeline. Photonic neural networks without gain face substantial limitations in network depth and inter-layer fan-out. Here, we demonstrate a fully integrated silicon photonic modulator neuron capable of up to 14.1 dB gain, achieved by modeling and addressing self-heating behavior in our output PN-junction micro-ring modulator. We use our experimental neuron to emulate a small network subject to high loss, achieving superior accuracy on an automated modulation classification benchmark to that of an optimal linear system. Our high-gain neuron can serve as a building block vastly expanding the range of neural network architectures that can be implemented with silicon photonics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpticaSame topicNeural Networks and Reservoir ComputingFrench-language works237,207