Bibliographic record
Abstract
Claire Keegan’s Small Things Like These transforms the novella form into a moral and formal intervention that exposes Ireland’s enduring complicity in the Magdalene Laundries. Through the ethical awakening of Bill Furlong, a working-class man in 1980s Ireland, Keegan stages a confrontation between individual conscience and collective denial. This article argues that the novella operates metaleptically, collapsing the boundary between fiction and reader, to compel ethical recognition through both structure and story. Drawing on Judith Butler’s theories of intervention and gendered power, alongside trauma and narrative theory, the analysis situates Keegan’s novella as a site where literature performs historical work. Keegan’s novella’s compression, moral clarity and refusal of catharsis embody a sustained interrogation of silence, complicity and institutional violence. In this way, Small Things Like These not only reanimates collective memory but demonstrates how the novella form itself can enact ethical and political agency, bridging private conscience and public reckoning. By reconfiguring the boundaries between history and imagination, Keegan reclaims the novella as a mode of resistance, insisting that moral responsibility persists beyond historical closure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".