Energy Management of Hybrid Energy System Considering a Demand-Side Management Strategy and Hydrogen Storage System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A hybrid energy system (HES) integrates various energy resources to attain synchronized energy output. However, HES faces significant challenges due to rising energy consumption, the expenses of using multiple sources, increased emissions due to non-renewable energy resources, etc. This study aims to develop an energy management strategy for distribution grids (DGs) by incorporating a hydrogen storage system (HSS) and demand-side management strategy (DSM), through the design of a multi-objective optimization technique. The primary focus is on optimizing operational costs and reducing pollution. These are approached as minimization problems, while also addressing the challenge of achieving a high penetration of renewable energy resources, framed as a maximization problem. The third objective function is introduced through the implementation of the demand-side management strategy, aiming to minimize the energy gap between initial demand and consumption. This DSM strategy is designed around consumers with three types of loads: sheddable loads, non-sheddable loads, and shiftable loads. To establish a bidirectional communication link between the grid and consumers by utilizing a distribution grid operator (DGO). Additionally, the uncertain behavior of wind, solar, and demand is modeled using probability distribution functions: Weibull for wind, PDF beta for solar, and Gaussian PDF for demand. To tackle this tri-objective optimization problem, this work proposes a hybrid approach that combines well-known techniques, namely, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (Hybrid-NSGA-II-MOPSO). Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model in optimizing the tri-objective problem while considering various constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".