Using a World Health Assembly simulation to explore undergraduate students’ perceptions and confidence in analyzing complex global health challenges: A mixed-methods evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional didactic teaching approaches fall short of adequately supporting diverse student learning styles. Complementing didactic teaching approaches with simulation-based experiential learning can bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. However, few studies have rigorously examined the outcomes of this approach in global health education and training. This study describes participants' self-reported experiences with the World Health Assembly Simulation (WHA SIM), a complex hybrid simulation consisting of a three-day educational exercise, including a tabletop exercise followed by live-action role play, designed to simulate practical global health governance settings. We conducted a descriptive, sequential exploratory study between September 2022 and July 2023, beginning with an anonymous pre-simulation survey among undergraduate students in the Faculty of Health at York University, followed by qualitative post-simulation interviews. The survey included questions on participants' background, comfort, and confidence in key practice skills and experiences with simulation-based learning. Data was analyzed using simple descriptive statistics for the quantitative data and a framework analysis for qualitative data. Among 39 survey respondents, 18 were interviewed. Participants for interviews were selected through snowball sampling to ensure diverse perspectives. Participants reported feeling more confident in a range of skills, including research capabilities, critical analysis, time management, and organizational effectiveness. They also described increased confidence in interpersonal communication, public speaking, networking, collaboration, and leadership. Several participants reflected on gaining a deeper appreciation of complex global health issues and noted the simulation provided valuable career-relevant insights. Findings highlight the value of simulation-based experiential learning as perceived by undergraduate students in health and science-related degree programs. While this study does not objectively measure knowledge acquisition or skill mastery, it illustrates how the WHA SIM can support confidence and reflective learning in global health education and training contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".