EV and Renewable Energy Integration in Residential Buildings: A Global Perspective on Deep Learning, Strategies, and Challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Charging electric vehicles (EVs) and integrating renewable energy sources (RESs) are becoming key aspects of residential energy systems. However, the variability of RES generation, combined with uncontrolled EV charging, poses challenges for reliability, power quality, and supply-demand balancing within communities. The challenges only grow when considering other electrified building loads as well. Accurate forecasting of power demand and renewable generation is essential for efficient and sustainable grid operation, optimal use of RESs, and effective energy trading within communities. Deep learning (DL), including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning (RL), has emerged as a promising solution for predicting consumer demand, renewable generation, and managing energy flows in residential environments. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the development and application of these methods for forecasting and energy management in residential communities. Evaluation metrics across studies indicate that supervised learning can achieve highly accurate forecasting results, especially when integrated with unsupervised K-means clustering and data decomposition. These methods help uncover patterns and relationships within the data while reducing noise, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy. RL shows significant potential in control applications, particularly for charging strategies. Similarly to how V2G-simulators model individual EV usage and simulate large fleets to generate grid-scale predictions, RL can be applied to various aspects of EV fleet management, including vehicle dispatching, smart scheduling, and charging coordination. Traditional methods are also used across different applications and help utilities with planning. However, these methods have limitations and may not always be completely accurate. Our review suggests that integrating hybrid supervised-unsupervised learning methods with RL can significantly improve the sustainability and resilience of energy systems. This approach can improve demand and generation forecasting while enabling smart charging coordination and scheduling for scalable EV fleets integrated with building electrification measures. Furthermore, the review introduces a unifying conceptual framework that links forecasting, optimization, and policy coupling through hierarchical deep learning layers, enabling scalable coordination of EV charging, renewable generation, and building energy management. Despite methodological advances, real-world deployment of hybrid and deep learning frameworks remains constrained by data-privacy restrictions, interoperability issues, and computational demands, highlighting the need for explainable, privacy-preserving, and standardized modeling approaches. To be effective in practice, these methods require robust data acquisition, optimized forecasting and control models, and integrated consideration of transport, building, and grid domains. Furthermore, deployment must account for data privacy regulations, cybersecurity safeguards, model interpretability, and economic feasibility to ensure resilient, scalable, and socially acceptable solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".