MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415820332 · doi:10.3390/wevj16110603

EV and Renewable Energy Integration in Residential Buildings: A Global Perspective on Deep Learning, Strategies, and Challenges

2025· article· en· W4415820332 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahmad Mohsenimanesh, Christopher McNevin, Evgueniy Entchev

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Electric Vehicle Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsRenewable energySmart gridReinforcement learningCluster analysisEnergy managementKey (lock)GridPerspective (graphical)Electric vehicle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charging electric vehicles (EVs) and integrating renewable energy sources (RESs) are becoming key aspects of residential energy systems. However, the variability of RES generation, combined with uncontrolled EV charging, poses challenges for reliability, power quality, and supply-demand balancing within communities. The challenges only grow when considering other electrified building loads as well. Accurate forecasting of power demand and renewable generation is essential for efficient and sustainable grid operation, optimal use of RESs, and effective energy trading within communities. Deep learning (DL), including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning (RL), has emerged as a promising solution for predicting consumer demand, renewable generation, and managing energy flows in residential environments. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the development and application of these methods for forecasting and energy management in residential communities. Evaluation metrics across studies indicate that supervised learning can achieve highly accurate forecasting results, especially when integrated with unsupervised K-means clustering and data decomposition. These methods help uncover patterns and relationships within the data while reducing noise, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy. RL shows significant potential in control applications, particularly for charging strategies. Similarly to how V2G-simulators model individual EV usage and simulate large fleets to generate grid-scale predictions, RL can be applied to various aspects of EV fleet management, including vehicle dispatching, smart scheduling, and charging coordination. Traditional methods are also used across different applications and help utilities with planning. However, these methods have limitations and may not always be completely accurate. Our review suggests that integrating hybrid supervised-unsupervised learning methods with RL can significantly improve the sustainability and resilience of energy systems. This approach can improve demand and generation forecasting while enabling smart charging coordination and scheduling for scalable EV fleets integrated with building electrification measures. Furthermore, the review introduces a unifying conceptual framework that links forecasting, optimization, and policy coupling through hierarchical deep learning layers, enabling scalable coordination of EV charging, renewable generation, and building energy management. Despite methodological advances, real-world deployment of hybrid and deep learning frameworks remains constrained by data-privacy restrictions, interoperability issues, and computational demands, highlighting the need for explainable, privacy-preserving, and standardized modeling approaches. To be effective in practice, these methods require robust data acquisition, optimized forecasting and control models, and integrated consideration of transport, building, and grid domains. Furthermore, deployment must account for data privacy regulations, cybersecurity safeguards, model interpretability, and economic feasibility to ensure resilient, scalable, and socially acceptable solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Electric Vehicle JournalSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207