MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415820364 · doi:10.33682/vv1j-z037

Teaching Research-based Theatre Online: A Narrative of Practice

2020· article· en· W4415820364 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Cook, Tetsuro Shigematsu, George Belliveau

Bibliographic record

VenueArtsPraxis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArtistic and Creative Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeGeneral partnershipNarrative inquiryCourse (navigation)Online teachingOnline course

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the last twelve years, students at the University of British Columbia could take a course in Research-based Theatre, a research methodology that transforms data into dramatic performances. Previously, this course has only ever been conducted in-person, but due to COVID-19, the course was offered online for the first time. This narrative of practice explores the authors' experience of translating the course into a virtual form. Throughout their experience of teaching Research-based Theatre over Zoom, the authors returned to fundamental questions: What teaching practices endure in the online Research-based Theatre classroom, and what new ways practices were fostered through our emerging partnership with technology?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtsPraxisSame topicArtistic and Creative ResearchFrench-language works237,207