MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415821339 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2025.3628129

Unified Fourier Graph-Based Spatiotemporal Learning and Corrected NWP for Multi-Site Ultra-Short Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting

2025· article· W4415821339 on OpenAlexaff
Chunyu Zhang, Xueqian Fu, Zhengshuo Li, Nanpeng Yu, Youmin Zhang, Haitong Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersShandong University
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemScalabilityNumerical weather predictionGridStability (learning theory)Data modelingTerm (time)Weather forecastingArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate multi-site ultra-short term photovoltaic (PV) power forecasting is essential for grid stability and efficient energy management. Existing methods are limited by coarse-resolution weather data and insufficient modeling of spatiotemporal dependencies. We propose a novel framework that combines bias-corrected high-resolution weather data with an Adaptive Fourier Graph Neural Network (PV-AFGNN) to capture complex spatial and temporal patterns. A Gated recurrent unit (GRU)-based encoder-decoder module refines Numerical Weather Prediction forecasts using local meteorological data, generating site-specific inputs for PV-AFGNN, which operates in the Fourier domain to model correlations efficiently. By jointly optimizing weather data correction and spatiotemporal learning, the framework achieves high accuracy even under challenging forecasting scenarios. Experiments on real-world multi-site PV datasets show that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks, offering a scalable and robust solution for reliable energy scheduling, and enhanced integration of PV power into modern electricity systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207