MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415821730 · doi:10.1109/itc58126.2025.00031

Holistic Validation Pattern Generation for IEEE 1687 and Streaming Scan Networks

2025· article· W4415821730 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastian Huhn, Matthias Kampmann, Jan Burchard, Reinhard Meier, Kacper Czerniawski, Lori Schramm, Nikita Naresh, Wilson Pradeep, Prachi Sinha, Mayank Parasrampuria, Jonathan Gaudet, Martin Keim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsSiemens (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)ScalabilityAutomatic test pattern generationDesign for testingTestabilityTest (biology)Model validation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing complexity of Integrated Circuits (ICs) is driven by heterogeneous functionality and stringent performance demands. This necessitates scalable and efficient design for testability (DFT) solutions to ensure cost-effective test access and functional correctness. Streaming Scan Network (SSN) and High-Bandwidth IJTAG over SSN (HB-IJTAG) enhance the test efficiency significantly by accelerating the data transfer and optimizing the test execution. However, these technologies introduce validation challenges due to more intricate control mechanisms and their large-scale deployment.This paper presents a novel, holistic approach for generating and sequencing functional validation patterns. These patterns systematically leverage SSN and HB-IJTAG capabilities to optimize overall efficiency. The proposed methodology enables the concurrent and robust validation of hundreds of SSN and HB-IJTAG DFT components, significantly improving the overall test execution time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207