MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415822856 · doi:10.1117/1.jbo.30.11.116002

Multifocal optical coherence tomography of the mouse eye to image the vitreoretinal vasculature in full depth

2025· article· en· W4415822856 on OpenAlexafffund
Simon Brais-Brunet, Raphaël Maltais–Tariant, Caroline Boudoux, Mathieu Dehaes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Optics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustinePolytechnique MontréalUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOptical coherence tomographyImage processingOptical imagingRetinaTomographyMedical imagingPreclinical imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance: optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the mouse vitreoretinal vasculature in full depth is technically challenging. Conventional OCT techniques employ axial confocal gating, which induces signal drop-off and limits spatial resolution outside the Rayleigh range. Aim: Our aim is to develop a multifocal OCT imaging approach using a tunable lens and a registration method that allows the generation of a composite image of the vitreoretinal vasculature while preserving high and uniform lateral spatial resolution, signal intensity, and image contrast in full depth. Approach: A calibration target was developed to characterize the multifocal optical system and quantify the signal intensity, contrast, and resolution. These optical specifications were used to image mice at postnatal day 14. Intra- and inter-volume registration methods were necessary to correct for motion and generate a composite image from single-focus images using weighted averaging. Results: ). In animals, signal intensity and contrast were 10 to 15 dB higher in the composite compared with single-focus images and highest in the hyaloid vasculature. Conclusions: This technique is promising in studying the mouse vitreoretinal vasculature during eye development and disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical OpticsSame topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207