MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415827543 · doi:10.1016/j.trre.2025.100971

Immune cell subsets in young kidney transplant recipients: Mechanistic and clinical perspectives

2025· review· en· W4415827543 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael Corr, Dessislava Malinova, Alexander P. Maxwell, Gareth J. McKay, Matthew D. Griffin

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation Reviews · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth and Social Care Research and Development DivisionHealth Service ExecutiveDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, IrelandHealth Research BoardCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
KeywordsImmunosenescenceImmune systemImmunosuppressionGerminal centerAcquired immune systemKidney transplantationBelataceptTransplantationImmune tolerance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kidney transplantation provides the best survival advantage for children, adolescents, and young adults with end-stage kidney disease, yet this group paradoxically experiences the poorest long-term graft survival. Immune-mediated rejection is the predominant cause, but the cellular mechanisms that underpin this age-related disparity remain incompletely defined. This review synthesises current evidence on the impact of immune ageing across adaptive and innate compartments, focusing on T cells, B cells, and natural killer (NK) cells. In younger recipients, a large naïve T- and B-cell pool, robust thymic output, and efficient germinal centre activity confer heightened alloimmune reactivity, driving increased risk of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection. In contrast, older recipients exhibit features of immunosenescence, including loss of CD28 expression, accumulation of terminally differentiated effector subsets, impaired germinal centre responses, and attenuated NK cytotoxicity, resulting in diminished capacity to mount de novo responses but greater vulnerability to infection. These immune trajectories have direct clinical implications: younger recipients may require intensified, mechanism-targeted immunosuppression, whereas older recipients may be more amenable to minimisation or tolerance protocols. We further highlight emerging evidence for premature immunosenescence in paediatric dialysis populations, the contribution of age-associated B cells and NK subsets, and the role of immunophenotype-guided therapeutic strategies. Current uniform immunosuppression protocols inadequately account for developmental and age-related immune heterogeneity. We argue for an age- and immune phenotype-informed approach to therapy, integrating longitudinal immune profiling, biomarker development, and systems immunology to improve risk stratification, promote tolerance, and ultimately extend allograft survival across all age groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation ReviewsSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207