MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415829411 · doi:10.3791/68058

Development of a Neonatal Piglet Acute Lung Injury Model Recreating the Early Environment of Preterm Infant Lungs

2025· article· en· W4415829411 on OpenAlexaff
Ewa Henckel, Doreen Engelberts, Marc‐Olivier Deguise, Shumei Zhong, Arul Vadivel, Bernard Thébaud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Visualized Experiments · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaPathogenesisInflammationLungLipopolysaccharideLung disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature birth is a major cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a severe consequence of extreme prematurity, leading to lung growth alterations and long-lasting developmental effects. The pathogenesis of BPD is multi-factorial, including mechanical ventilation, hyperoxia, and inflammation as the main drivers of its development. Currently, there is no treatment for BPD. In this study, a feasible and reproducible new neonatal piglet model of acute lung injury (ALI), mimicking the clinical stimuli faced by the human preterm lung, is presented. The multi-hit ALI neonatal piglet model - combining surfactant depletion, hyperoxia, high pressure-ventilation, and intratracheal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration results in impaired oxygenation, perturbed lung function, inflammation with neutrophil infiltration, and histological lung injury. Its main advantages are using the harmful stimuli known to drive BPD pathogenesis and its low maintenance. It generates high-fidelity ALI, meeting the American Thoracic Society ALI criteria. Large animal models, such as this piglet model, are critical to understanding early pathogenic factors, identifying therapeutic targets, and facilitating clinical translation to patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.426 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Visualized ExperimentsSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207