MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415830308 · doi:10.1093/dote/doaf096

Risk stratification for stricture formation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal dysplasia

2025· article· en· W4415830308 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kareem Khalaf, Youstina Hanna, T Nishimura, Huaqi Li, Natalia Causada Calo, Gary R. May, Christopher Teshima, Jeffrey D. Mosko

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of the Esophagus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEsophageal strictureEndoscopic submucosal dissectionRetrospective cohort studyTriamcinolone acetonidePrednisoneCohortDysplasiaDissection (medical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical, procedural, and histopathologic factors associated with stricture development following esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ESD for esophageal lesions from 2019 to 2024 at St. Michael's Hospital, in Toronto, Canada. The primary outcome was stricture formation, defined as a symptomatic luminal narrowing at the ESD site confirmed on follow-up endoscopy, requiring intervention. Strictures requiring dilation developed in 24% of patients, 85% of which were impassable with a standard gastroscope (9.9 mm diameter). Stricture rates increased with defect circumferential involvement: <50% (7.7%), 50%-74% (11.5%), 75%-89% (23.1%), and ≥90% (57.7%). Intraprocedural local triamcinolone acetate (LTA) injection was administered in 40 of 108 patients (37%), with a mean defect circumferential size of 87.5%. Among patients receiving LTA, stricture rates varied based on defect size: for <50% circumferential defect involvement (n = 1) and 50%-74% (n = 3), no strictures developed; for 75%-90% (n = 17), 6 patients (35%) developed strictures, 5 of which were impassable; and for 90%-100% (n = 19), 11 patients (58%) developed strictures, all of which were impassable. Patients selectively discharged on prophylactic steroids demonstrated varied stricture rates depending on the steroid regimen: prednisone (61.5%), oral budesonide (26.9%), and combination therapy (7.7%). Independent predictors of stricture formation included defect circumferential involvement (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.12, p < 0.001), length of hospitalization (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.11-3.16, p = 0.018), and presence of deep mural injury (OR 6.28, 95% CI 1.10-35.88, p = 0.039). Stricture formation post-ESD is strongly associated with lesion and procedural characteristics, including defect circumferential involvement, deep mural injury, and length of hospitalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiseases of the EsophagusSame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207