SLGCA: spatial cross-level graph contrastive autoencoder for multislice spatial domain identification and microenvironment exploration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of spatial transcriptomics (ST) technologies has enabled researchers to better understand cells' spatial organization and functional heterogeneity within their native tissue context. Spatial domain identification plays a crucial role in ST data analysis. However, most existing spatial domain identification methods do not fully exploit spatial information, and often fail to adequately integrate both local and global features, resulting in suboptimal spatial domain identification. We propose SLGCA, a novel method based on cross-level graph contrastive learning to address these challenges. SLGCA adopts a dual-channel learning mechanism, combining local-level contrastive learning based on spatial neighborhood information and global information contrastive learning across views, thereby significantly enhancing the accuracy of spatial domain identification. SLGCA can integrate multiple tissue sections without needing pre-alignment or external tools, eliminating batch effects and accurately identifying spatial domains across multiple slices. Experimental results show that SLGCA significantly outperforms the benchmark methods in spatial domain identification accuracy on ST data generated by multiple techniques. Moreover, SLGCA enables accurate dissection of tumor heterogeneity in human breast cancer datasets and effectively uncovers the heterogeneous tumor microenvironment in liver cancer, revealing two distinct fibroblast subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".