Endodontic Microsurgery On Vertical Root Fracture With 24-Month Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vertical root fractures (VRFs) predominantly occur in endodontically treated teeth, particularly in young permanent teeth with thin radicular dentin. Microbial colonization of crack lines, often undetectable during initial stages, progressively leads to alveolar bone resorption and refractory periapical inflammation, traditionally mandating tooth extraction. Contemporary endodontic microsurgery incorporating bioceramic materials like iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramix, Canada) now offers a viable tooth-preserving alternative. This case report describes a mandibular first premolar with a persistent gingival sinus tract for three years following apexification and apical barrier. Clinical examination revealed neither isolated deep periodontal pockets nor obvious pathognomonic halo radiolucency. Microsurgical exploration identified an incomplete vertical fracture extending from the apical region to the cervical third of the root, which was successfully repaired using iRoot BP Plus. Postoperative evaluation at 5- and 24-month intervals demonstrated complete resolution of clinical symptoms with radiographic evidence of periapical bone regeneration. Early VRF diagnosis remains clinically challenging, requiring comprehensive assessment combining clinical examination and radiographic interpretation. Definitive diagnosis often necessitates surgical exploration to confirm the presence of root cracks. This case demonstrates that incomplete VRFs can be effectively managed through microsurgical intervention using advanced bioceramic materials. The findings indicate that microsurgical exploration serves as a valuable diagnostic tool for early VRF detection, while bioceramic-assisted repair offers a biologically favorable treatment alternative to extraction. Further clinical studies are warranted to establish long-term prognosis and case selection criteria for this conservative approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".