Sc In Large Apical Sizes Of Permanent Teeth With Cap
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The endodontic treatment of root canals with large apical sizes is considered one of the most complex challenges for clinicians. This case series evaluated the clinical outcome of single-cone (SC)obturation technique with iRoot SP in root canals with large apical sizes in chronic apical periodontitis(CAP). Case description The teeth with large apical sizes and CAP were treated. After access preparation and establishing apical patency, root canal preparation and disinfection were performed. IRoot SP(Innovative Bioceramix Inc., Vancouver, Canada)assisted gutta percha tip filling root canal. Radiography was performed to check the root canal obturation. The access cavity was sealed with GIC or composite resin. The treated teeth were followed up for at least two years. Discussion Clinical evaluation during the follow-up period revealed the significant healing of periapical lesions. After 2 years, teeth were asymptomatic and tested negatively in all clinical tests. Radiographs showed no further progression of resorption and healing of the periapical tissues. Conclusion/clinical significance Cases in this report show the effectiveness of SC with iRoot SP for treating large apical sizes in permanent teeth with chronic apical periodontitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".