Contraceptive hormones and social instability stress in adolescence and in adulthood: Effects on anxiety and social behaviour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hormonal contraceptives (HCs), particularly those containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG), are widely used, yet their effects on adolescent brain and behaviour remain underexplored. Here, we investigated the effects of EE and LNG on anxiety-like and social behaviours in adolescent and adult female rats, and whether social instability stress (SS) exacerbates these effects. We predicted that adolescents may be more susceptible to the effects of HCs and SS than adults, given ongoing brain development in adolescence. Sixty-four adolescent (postnatal day (PND) 22) and 64 adult (PND62) gonadally-intact female Long-Evans rats were randomized to SS or control groups, and then to HC (10 μg/kg EE, 20 μg/kg LNG) or vehicle treatment daily for 16 days. Behavioural assessments (elevated plus maze, social interaction test, operant social reward) took place during the last six days of treatment. HC treatment reduced open-arm entries overall. For time on the open arms, there was an age-by-stress-by-treatment interaction: SS adolescent rats displayed more anxiety-like behaviour compared to SS adult rats in those treated with vehicle. For social interaction there was a stress-by-treatment interaction such that in controls, HC reduced interaction; in vehicle-treated rats, SS reduced interaction. Across ages, HC increased sensitivity to and motivation for social reward; adolescents showed higher overall social reward than adults. This study provides novel insights into the interaction of exogenous hormones and social stress on brain-behaviour relationships at different stages of development. • Ethinyl estradiol (EE) + levonorgestrel (LNG) produced an anxiogenic profile. • EE + LNG increased social reward sensitivity and motivation irrespective of age at treatment. • Social instability stress (SS) decreased social interaction. • Hormonal contraceptive and SS effects were mostly independent of age of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".