MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415836933 · doi:10.5840/symposium202529218

Who Welcomes Whom? About Derrida’s Unconditional Hospitality

2025· article· W4415836933 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jacob Rogozinski

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityPoliticsEvent (particle physics)HostilityReciprocal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this text, I first criticize Derrida’s conception of “unconditioned” ethical hospitality. It is problematic because, by demanding to welcome the arrival of the newcomer as a “messianic” event and by guilting the one that welcomes him/her, Derrida operates a mere inversion of the xenophobic position. Contrary to what he asserts, being-here and being-at-home can be understood as the condition of the possibility of a hospitable reception. The Derridean conception of hospitality thus leads to an aporia, to an insurmountable antinomy. This is why I propose to return to Kant, to his political conception of hospitality which, by overcoming the reciprocal hostility between peoples, would make possible a pacified “cosmopolitical society.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposiumSame topicPhilosophy, Ethics, and ExistentialismFrench-language works237,207