MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415836940 · doi:10.5840/symposium202529219

L’autre en moi. Des frontières aux lacunes (qui ne sont pas les mêmes)

2025· article· W4415836940 on OpenAlex
Délia Popa

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicDiverse Academia and Research Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe ImaginaryPsychoanalytic theoryAlterityUnconscious mindPoliticsOrder (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper questions the philosophical and the political imaginary that tends to situate the alterity of the other on the other side of a frontier, be it visible or invisible, real or imaginary. In support of the hypothesis of another that is not to be found in the vaguely distant horizon, the Husserlian concepts of association, pairing, and imaginary transposition are first considered in order to give an account of a troubling proximity of the other. This framework is complexified next with the help of psychoanalytic reflections on the status of unconscious phantasms in their relationship to history. The paper ends by opening a liminary space made of lacunae that allows us to encounter each other and to make sense of these encounters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it