MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415847535 · doi:10.1080/15502783.2025.2550169

An interim analysis of the influence of eating disorder risk, body dissatisfaction, physical activity, and diet on bone mineral density in college-aged females

2025· article· en· W4415847535 on OpenAlex
Leah E. Allen, Christine Le, Conor F. Horlock, Margaret T. Jones, Andrew R. Jagim, Jennifer B. Fields

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHatch
KeywordsClinical nutritionInterim analysisBone densityBone mineralInterimEating disordersBody mass index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background This study aimed to examine relationships between BMD z-scores, eating disorder (ED) risk, body image dissatisfaction (BID), physical activity, and dietary intake in college females.Methods College-aged females (n = 20, age: 19 ± 1 yrs, weight: 58 ± 9 kg, BF%: 29 ± 6%) participated in this cross-sectional study. Whole body, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Participants completed validated questionnaires to assess ED risk and BID. Objective physical activity (daily steps, daily physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), time spent in sedentary (PAs), light (PAL), moderate (PAM), and vigorous (PAV) zones), and dietary intake were quantified across 3-days via a wrist-worn accelerometer and a self-reported food log, respectively. Spearman correlations evaluated relationships between BMD, ED scores, BID, physical activity metrics, and dietary intake (p < 0.05).Results 47–65% of participants had low BMD (z-score < 0) at whole-body, hip, and spine sites, with 40% classified as osteopenic (Ta ble 1). Additionally, 20% were at risk of ED and 65% conveyed BID. Participants averaged 15,789 ± 4,116 daily steps, expending 986 ± 396 active calories. Total hip BMD z-scores were positively associated with daily steps (r = 0.462, p = 0.046), PAEE (r = 0.493, p = 0.032), and PAM (r = 0.575, p = 0.010). No other relationships were observed between BMD, ED risk, BID, and dietary intake (calories, carbohydrates, protein, fat, calcium) (p > 0.05).Conclusions A high incidence of low BMD was observed across all sites (whole body, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar), with BMD z-scores associated with physical activity (daily step counts, PAEE, and PAM), but not with dietary intake, ED risk, or BID. These findings highlight the importance of physical activity for maintaining bone health in premenopausal females. As BMD reflects long-term bone health, it may not capture acute dietary or lifestyle changes, highlighting the need to assess dynamic bone turnover markers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it