MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415847599 · doi:10.5194/amt-18-6093-2025

Five years of GOSAT-2 retrievals with RemoTeC: XCO <sub>2</sub> and XCH <sub>4</sub> data products with quality filtering by machine learning

2025· article· en· W4415847599 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew G. Barr, Jochen Landgraf, Mari C. Martinez-Velarte, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Ralf Sussmann, Isamu Morino, Kimberly Strong, Minqiang Zhou, Voltaire A. Velazco, Hirofumi Ohyama, Thorsten Warneke, Frank Hase, Tobias Borsdorff

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric measurement techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHorizon 2020European Space Agency
KeywordsFlaggingGreenhouse gasData setFilter (signal processing)Data qualityQuality (philosophy)Data processingMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately measuring greenhouse gas concentrations to identify regional sources and sinks is essential for effectively monitoring and mitigating their impact on the Earth's changing climate. In this article we present the scientific data products of XCO 2 and XCH 4 , retrieved with RemoTeC, from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite-2 (GOSAT-2), which span a time range of 5 years. GOSAT-2 has the capability to measure total columns of CO 2 and CH 4 to the necessary requirements set by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), who define said requirements as accuracy<10 ppb and <0.5 ppm for XCH 4 and XCO 2 respectively, and stability of <3ppbyr-1 and <0.5ppmyr-1 for XCH 4 and XCO 2 respectively. Central to the quality of the XCO 2 and XCH 4 datasets is the post-retrieval quality flagging step. Previous versions of RemoTeC products have relied on threshold filtering, flagging data using boundary conditions from a list of retrieval parameters. We present a novel quality filtering approach utilising a machine learning technique known as Random Forest Classifier (RFC) models. This method is developed under the European Space Agency's (ESA) Climate Change Initiative+ (CCI+) program and applied to data from GOSAT-2. Data from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) are employed to train the RFC models, where retrievals are categorized as good or bad quality based on the bias between GOSAT-2 and TCCON measurements. TCCON is a global network of Fourier transform spectrometers that measure telluric absorption spectra at infrared wavelengths. It serves as the scientific community's standard for validating satellite-derived XCO 2 and XCH 4 data. Our results demonstrate that the machine learning-based quality filtering achieves a significant improvement, with data yield increasing by up to 85 % and RMSE improving by up to 30 %, compared to traditional threshold-based filtering. Furthermore, inter-comparison with the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) indicates that the quality filtering RFC models generalise well to the full dataset, as the expected behaviour is reproduced on a global scale. Low systematic biases are essential for extracting meaningful fluxes from satellite data products. Through TCCON validation we find that all data products are within the breakthrough bias requirements set, with RMSE for XCH 4 < 15 ppb and XCO 2 < 2 ppm. We derive station-to-station biases of 4.2 ppb and 0.5 ppm for XCH 4 and XCO 2 respectively, and linear drift of 0.6 ppb yr −1 and 0.2 ppm yr −1 for XCH 4 and XCO 2 respectively. For XCH 4 , GOSAT-2 and TROPOMI are highly correlated with standard deviations less than 18 ppb and globally averaged biases close to 0 ppb. The inter-satellite bias between GOSAT and GOSAT-2 is significant, with an average global bias of −15 ppb. This is comparable to that seen between GOSAT and TROPOMI, consistent with our findings that GOSAT-2 and TROPOMI are in close agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric measurement techniquesSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207