MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415850243 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-25005-z

Coverage of the influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations among immigrant and non-immigrant older adults in Canada: a cross-sectional analysis of data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA)

2025· article· en· W4415850243 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ji Yoon Kim, Giorgia Sulis, W. Alton Russell, Seungmi Yang, Jesse Papenburg, Ananya Banerjee, Patricia Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of OttawaMcGill University Health Centre
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsBiostatisticsVaccinationLongitudinal studyImmigrationPneumococcal vaccinationEpidemiologyPublic healthCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination coverage in older adults fall below the target of 80%. Being an immigrant may be associated with lower coverage of both vaccinations, but limited efforts have been made in the Canadian context to explore such disparities. Therefore, we examined the association between immigrant status and coverage of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations among older adults as well as the relative importance of immigrant status in predicting coverage of both vaccinations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging data. We descriptively analyzed coverage of both vaccinations by immigrant status and used Poisson regression models with robust standard errors to estimate the associations of immigrant status and other key equity stratifiers with vaccination. Importance of various determinants, including immigrant status, in predicting both vaccinations were assessed using random forest algorithms. RESULTS: Immigrant participants reported lower coverage of influenza vaccination in the past 12 months (63.8% [95% CI: 60.9-66.7%] vs. 66.9% [95% CI: 65.5-68.3%]) and pneumococcal vaccination ever (48.7% [95% CI: 45.6-51.8%] vs. 55.8% [95% CI: 54.3-57.3%]). Prevalence of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were both lower among immigrant participants compared to non-immigrant participants. Immigrant status was among the 10 most important predictors of pneumococcal vaccination, but among the less important predictors of influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we found disparities in influenza and pneumococcal vaccination by immigrant status among older adults in Canada. Further studies on vaccination coverage and decision-making among marginalized communities, including immigrants, are warranted to equitably improve vaccine uptake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→