MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415853721 · doi:10.53555/kw54zr65

Reproductive biology of Amblypharyngodon melletinus muriyadensis – an ornamental fish of the Western Ghats of India

2023· article· W4415853721 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dalie Dominic A, N D Inasu, Swapana Johny

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpawn (biology)Ornamental plantBreedReproductive biologyDominance (genetics)Fish <Actinopterygii>Fish stock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ornamental fish industry directlydepends on the fish and their ongoing availability. Fish spawn during a certain stage oftheir reproductive cycle some breed just once a year, while others do so at regular intervals all year long.Each speciescarefully chooses the best season to have the greatest number of offspring.Since allphasesof fisharenotappropriate forthe ornamental fish marketa scientific foundation is necessary for each species collection.Keecheri and Puzhakkal riversare two important rivers of Thrissur district,Kerala. The region hasimmensepotential with respect to ornamental fishtrade.Therefore,the availability ofAmblypharyngodon melettinus muriyadensisfor the trade was assessed in this work.In this studysexratio anddistribution of mature stageswas conductedto provide management cues and promotional basisfor sustainable yield ofornamental fish.The study revealedfemale dominance over male.It was identified that the fishbreed during monsoon season and mature at short length increasing their potential to produce offsprings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207