MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415855709 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13212792

Healthy Eating Is More than the Foods You Eat: Eating Practices of Mothers with and Without a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

2025· article· en· W4415855709 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mélissa Bélanger, Charlotte Simoneau, Julie Perron, Simone Lemieux, Julie Robitaille

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDanone Institute of CanadaInstituto DanoneDiabetes CanadaUniversité LavalDanone
KeywordsWaistGestational diabetesHealthy eatingAnthropometryBody mass indexDiabetes mellitusFood groupPregnancyCircumference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Canada’s Food Guide 2019 includes advice such as “Cook more often” and “Eat meals with others”, which are considered healthy eating practices. However, mothers with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may face specific barriers to adopting healthy eating practices. This study aimed to compare eating practices between mothers with (GDM+) and without (GDM−) a history of GDM, and to explore the associations between eating practices, diet quality, and the anthropometric and cardiometabolic profile of these mothers. Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in Quebec (Canada) between 2012 and 2017. Eating practices were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Diet quality was evaluated by the Healthy Eating Food Index 2019 through a validated food frequency questionnaire. Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured, and body composition was obtained by absorptiometry. Results: Data from 105 GDM+ and 38 GDM− mothers were analyzed (mean age 37.5 years ± 4.9). GDM+ mothers were more likely to prepare a greater proportion of dinners (≥1 per week) using pre-prepared or processed foods than GDM− mothers (49.0% vs. 34.2%; p = 0.016). Among GDM+ mothers, those who prepared ≥1 dinners per week using pre-prepared or processed foods showed lower adherence to the “Whole-grain foods” (1.1 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 1.2; p = 0.002) and “Sodium” (4.9 ± 2.0 vs. 5.8 ± 2.0, p = 0.013) recommendations, had a higher percentage of total body fat (37.5% ± 7.6 vs. 34.0% ± 7.7; p = 0.041), a higher waist circumference (91.6 cm ± 13.9 vs. 87.1 cm ± 16.3; p = 0.030), and a higher glycated hemoglobin (5.6% ± 0.5 vs. 5.5% ± 0.3; p = 0.025) than those who used less pre-prepared or processed foods. Conclusions: GDM+ mothers were more likely than GDM− mothers to prepare dinners using pre-prepared or processed foods, an eating practice associated with less favorable components of diet quality and some altered anthropometric and cardiometabolic variables. Further investigation into the factors influencing cooking from scratch within this population is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207