MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415871018 · doi:10.7759/cureus.96065

Topiramate-Induced Bilateral Acute Angle Closure in a Healthy Young Female

2025· article· en· W4415871018 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J Miyashiro, William A Newsom, Nikki P Inamine, Gary S Inamine

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsEyeball (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopiramateDiscontinuationAcute angleBlurred visionEtiologyMigraine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topiramate is a widely prescribed medication for epilepsy, migraine prophylaxis, and weight management, but it can rarely cause acute bilateral angle closure with myopic shift. We describe a healthy 35-year-old woman who developed sudden bilateral painful red eyes, blurred vision, and a myopic shift within one week of initiating topiramate. Examination revealed shallow anterior chambers, elevated intraocular pressure, and iridocorneal touch bilaterally. Prompt discontinuation of topiramate led to full resolution. Laser peripheral iridotomies (LPIs) were performed while the etiology was uncertain, and are not typically required in medication-induced effusion-related angle closure. This case underscores that cycloplegia and drug cessation are the key interventions, while LPI may be performed only when the underlying mechanism is unclear. This case highlights the importance of recognizing medication-induced angle closure and distinguishing it from primary pupillary-block mechanisms to ensure timely, vision-saving management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207