MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415871439 · doi:10.1021/acsaelm.5c01550

Molybdenum Oxide Artificial Synapse: Enabling Cognitive Learning, Image Recognition, and Denoising

2025· article· en· W4415871439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vaishnavi M. Rajesh, Lakshya Jangra, K. B. Jinesh

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Electronic Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Institute of Space Science and Technology
KeywordsNeuromorphic engineeringImage qualityNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)Noise reductionImage processingConvolutional neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromorphic systems, which are inspired by the human brain, hold great promise for significant advances in future AI applications, particularly in energy-efficient and real-time image processing. This paper presents the fabrication of a high-temperature sputtered molybdenum oxide-based artificial synapse that replicates essential synaptic properties, including Paired Pulse Facilitation/Depression (PPF/PPD), Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity (STDP), Spike Number-Dependent Plasticity (SNDP), and Spike Frequency-Dependent Plasticity (SFDP) as well as two specific cognitive models: the Atkinson-Shiffrin model and Ebbinghaus memory curve. The intrusion of noise into an image results in degradation of the image quality during processing and visualization. Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) is a powerful tool for atomic-scale surface characterization; however, its inherently slow scanning process and susceptibility to various noise sources often result in low-quality images that are frequently discarded. There are denoising algorithms that are relatively effective but have low energy efficiency and a long computation time. This paper presents a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based denoising model based on the Au/Mo x O y /FTO artificial synapse with denoising and image preservation of the Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite (HOPG) STM images and a cartoon rendering of a cat, achieved through a correlation between conductance states and image pixels The model’s performance is quantitatively evaluated using Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) metrics, demonstrating effective noise suppression while maintaining image integrity. The device exhibits efficient pattern recognition on the MNIST handwritten digit data set, attaining an accuracy of 92.2%, underscoring its potential for neuromorphic computing applications. Furthermore, its applicability in image processing is validated through training and inference on the Canadian Institute For Advanced Research-10 (CIFAR-10) data set using the CNN model, where a maximum recognition accuracy of 94.06% is attained. This study emphasizes the capabilities of molybdenum oxide-based synaptic devices in progressing artificial intelligence, image enhancement, and edge computing applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Bench or experimentalmedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Electronic MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207