MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415877740 · doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109943

Simulation of the pea crop development using AquaCrop model in Chichaoua region, Morocco: Application for irrigation management

2025· article· en· W4415877740 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lamia Jallal, Salah Er‐Raki, Saïd Khabba, Jamal Ezzahar, Oumaima Kaissi, Zoubair Rafi, A. Chehbouni

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Water Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondation OCPMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de la Formation des CadresOntario College of Pharmacists
KeywordsEvapotranspirationIrrigationCalibrationGrowing seasonCrop coefficientMean squared errorLeaf area indexBiomass (ecology)Deficit irrigationCoefficient of determination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to calibrate and validate the AquaCrop model to accurately simulate key growth parameters of pea crops in the semi-arid Chichaoua region of central Morocco. It specifically targets, canopy cover (CC), actual evapotranspiration (ETa), total soil water content (SWC), biomass (B), and grain yield (GY). The model was firstly calibrated using observed data from the 2022 growing season, while data from the 2018 growing season were used for validation. The calibration process focused on identifying key parameters, including water productivity (WP), harvest index (HI), and maximum crop transpiration coefficient (KcTr,x), by minimizing the differences between observed data and simulated model outputs. The optimal values obtained were 14.6 g/m² for WP, 39 % for HI, and 0.95 for KcTr,x. Overall, it was found that the model effectively simulated all the growth parameters during the calibration and validation processes. The average Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) between observed and simulated CC was 3.7 %. In addition, biomass and grain yields for the calibration season were simulated with RMSE values of 100 and 74 kg ha −1 , respectively. Furthermore, the model performed well in simulating ETa and SWC with RMSE values for ETa and SWC of 0.57 mm/day and 20 mm/m. For the validation phase, ETa and SWC were well retrieved, the RMSE values were 0.80 mm/day and 59.74 mm/m, respectively. This calibrated model can serve as a valuable tool for decision-makers in agriculture by supporting the development of efficient irrigation strategies, optimizing water use, and maintaining crop productivity under water-limited conditions. Finally, the AquaCrop model was used to schedule irrigation based on the root zone water depletion threshold (Dr, threshold) across the field. The findings demonstrated that irrigating at 40 % depletion of TAW serves as an effective threshold for enhancing pea irrigation management. This threshold allows for a significant reduction of 40 mm in water use over the growing season. This analysis revealed important insights into irrigation efficiency, showing to farmers that excessive water applications often fail to translate into yield improvements while contributing to significant water losses. In semi-arid regions, irrigation practices are the most important factor in agriculture, so our study highlights to farmers the importance of proper irrigation timing and the importance of meeting the actual crop requirements. • AquaCrop was well calibrated and validated for estimating key growth parameters of pea. • The average RMSE are 3.7% for CC, 100 kg ha -1 for biomass, and 74 kg ha -1 for grain yield. • The Main calibration parameters are 39% for HI, 14.6 g/m² for WP*, and 0.95 for KcTr,x. • Irrigating at 40% TAW depletion reduces water use by 40 mm over the season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Water ManagementSame topicClimate change impacts on agricultureFrench-language works237,207