MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415881063 · doi:10.2118/229856-ms

Sustainability in Maritime: Human-Centered Decarbonization Through Behavioral Change

2025· article· W4415881063 on OpenAlexaff
Abhay Nimbalkar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Canadian institutionsGreenfield Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityIncentiveFuel efficiencySoftware deploymentAgency (philosophy)Investment (military)Behavioral economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper explores a transformative approach to maritime decarbonization by emphasizing human behavior—termed "Carbon Culture"—as a central lever for reducing emissions. The maritime sector is responsible for approximately 2.89% of global CO2 emissions, translating to more than 1 billion metric tons annually. While most decarbonization strategies center around technical retrofits, alternative fuels, and regulatory compliance with frameworks like EEXI, CII, and national / local regulations, this study proposes a complementary, human-centric model. It focuses on real-time reporting, crew awareness, continuous training, and performance-based incentives to drive behavioral change towards optimizing fuel efficiency. The core methodology integrates behavioral science with digital operations, embedding sustainability directly into day-to-day workflows. Crews and shore teams are encouraged to make deliberate, fuel-saving choices through data-informed voyage planning, maintenance , engine load optimization, trim management, and energy-efficient auxiliary usage. These behavioral shifts are enabled and reinforced through user-friendly software platform, which provides mobile dashboards, gamified leaderboards, and microlearning modules to engage seafarers and reinforce sustainability principles. Global industry benchmarks suggest that operational inefficiencies account for 10–15% of excess fuel usage. According to Clarkson Research, a typical medium-sized tanker consumes 25–35 metric tons of fuel oil per day. Behavioral interventions can reduce this consumption by 2.5–3.5 tons per day. Fleet-wide data analyzed in this study indicates a 5–10% reduction in daily fuel consumption, resulting in direct cost savings of $1,000–$2,000 per vessel per day, depending on fuel price and voyage profile. These findings affirm that human behavior, when properly supported by digital tools and incentives, can deliver tangible environmental and financial benefits. This approach offers an accessible, scalable, and cost-effective pathway to help maritime sector fleets meet evolving IMO, EU ETS, and national decarbonization mandates. It also serves as a strategic bridge during the industry's transition to future fuel systems, helping close short-term compliance gaps while positioning ships crews for long-term sustainability roles. In conclusion, the integration of human factors with digital maritime operations presents a timely and replicable solution to support the global maritime sector's decarbonization ambitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Transport Emissions and EfficiencyFrench-language works237,207