MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415883065 · doi:10.1109/twc.2025.3626324

Integrated Sensing and Backscatter Communication for Target Identification and Parameter Estimation

2025· article· W4415883065 on OpenAlexaff
Songmin Li, Jie Chen, Jungang Ge, Ying‐Chang Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInitializationEstimation theoryBackscatter (email)EstimatorDetectorInterference (communication)SIGNAL (programming language)Identification (biology)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a novel integrated sensing and backscatter communication (ISABC) system in which each moving target is attached with a backscatter device (BD) to facilitate simultaneous target identification and parameter estimation. When the base station (BS) transmits signals to its desired user, each BD attached to the target transmits the target identification information to the BS via backscatter communication, which concurrently enhances the echo signal strength. The BS needs to detect the BD symbols and to estimate the target parameters using the echoes. This task, however, is challenging due to the coupling between the BD symbols and the target parameters. To address this issue, we propose a novel iterative detection and estimation (IDE) framework, which involves the following two processes alternately: 1) Utilizing a modified maximum likelihood (ML) estimator to perform parameter estimation with the detected BD symbols; 2) Employing the ML detector to detect the BD symbols with the estimated target parameters. Since the inter-carrier interference (ICI) of the OFDM signal is independent of the BD symbols, but contains the delay and Doppler shift information, we develop a target parameter initialization method using such ICI component to improve the performance of the proposed IDE scheme. Moreover, the closed-form Miller-Chang bound is derived to demonstrate the theoretical performance for the target parameter estimation. Finally, simulation results are provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207