MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415885057 · doi:10.1111/trf.18477

Development and validation of a pediatric transfusion medicine education assessment tool

2025· article· en· W4415885057 on OpenAlexafffund
Ines Zuna, Yulia Lin, Richard L. Haspel, Catharine M. Walsh, Jeffrey N. Bone, Casey Kapitany, Lani Lieberman, Teresa Skelton

Bibliographic record

VenueTransfusion · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Blood ServicesUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkBC Children's HospitalThe Wilson CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Blood ServicesBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsTransfusion medicineBlueprintCurriculumTest (biology)Pediatric MedicineMEDLINEEducational measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pediatric transfusion medicine presents unique challenges due to differences in pediatric physiology and pathology compared to adults. Research shows that pediatric healthcare professionals have knowledge gaps in transfusion medicine, contributing to suboptimal practice. To address these gaps, Transfusion Camp, a transfusion medicine education program, was adapted to a pediatric-focused curriculum. To assess pediatric learners' knowledge uptake, we aimed to develop and validate the Pediatric Transfusion Knowledge Test. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The BEST TEST-3, a previously validated transfusion medicine knowledge assessment tool, was modified by a multidisciplinary committee of content experts, using a curriculum blueprint for pediatric transfusion medicine consisting of 31 core and 42 extended topics, identified through a previously published national multi-specialty Delphi consensus study. The modified test was administered to 8 novice, 20 intermediate, and 14 expert participants in pediatric transfusion medicine. Data were analyzed using Rasch psychometric modeling to finalize test content. RESULTS: The finalized assessment tool included 25 multiple-choice questions, with balanced representation across the cognitive processes outlined in Bloom's taxonomy. Twenty-four questions demonstrated good fit statistics with infit average 0.99 (0.8-1.2) and outfit average 0.96 (0.78-1.22). One question required revision. Question difficulty ranged from -2.78 to 1.61 on the logit scale, with gaps observed for higher-ability test-takers. DISCUSSION: Developing the Pediatric Transfusion Knowledge Test represents a systematic approach to adapting and validating an assessment using a curriculum blueprint and ensuring alignment with educational materials. It adapts an existing assessment and incorporates evidence-based pedagogical principles. This framework can be applied to develop other assessments within medical education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.077
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.077
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransfusionSame topicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207