MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415892453 · doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2025.111262

Quantum optimal transport with convex regularization

2025· article· en· W4415892453 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emanuele Caputo, Augusto Gerolin, Nataliia Monina, Lorenzo Portinale

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Functional Analysis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
Topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCanada Research ChairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsRegular polygonQuantumRegularization (linguistics)Convex optimizationConvex functionMinification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this manuscript, we study the (finite-dimensional) static formulation of quantum optimal transport problems with general convex regularization and its unbalanced relaxation. In both cases, we show a duality result, characterizations of minimizers (for the primal) and maximizers (for the dual). An important tool we define is a non-commutative version of the classical -transforms associated with a general convex regularization, which we employ to prove the convergence of the associated Sinkhorn iterations. Finally, we show the convergence of the unbalanced transport problems towards the constrained one, as well as the convergence of transforms, as the marginal penalization parameters go to +∞.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Functional AnalysisSame topicstochastic dynamics and bifurcationFrench-language works237,207