MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415896806 · doi:10.1002/cjce.70142

Thermal and catalytic liquefaction of high ash Indian coals: Kinetics, mechanism, and product characterization

2025· article· en· W4415896806 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Govind Dubey, Prabu Vairakannu, Pankaj Tiwari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquefactionFraction (chemistry)MethaneTolueneCoalCoal liquefactionCatalysisCarbochemistryTetrahydrofuran

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, the direct coal liquefaction (DCL) of high‐ash Indian coals was studied. The DCL experiments were carried out with a 1 wt.% Fe 2 O 3 catalyst in a 200 mL reactor within a temperature range of 400–450°C, using tetrahydronaphthalene (tetralin) as solvent. The process yielded gas, liquid, and residue, along with water. The liquid fraction was classified as hexane soluble (oil), toluene soluble (asphaltene), and tetrahydrofuran soluble (pre‐asphaltene). The maximum conversions were 72.57 and 67.45 wt.%, and the oil yields of 42.33 and 39.43 wt.% were observed for lignite coal at 60 min of residence time and 450°C for catalytic and thermal liquefaction, respectively. For the maximum concentration of pyrite of 29.43% in lignite coal, the oil yield was maximum. A hypothetical six‐lumped kinetic model was employed. The activation energy values were in the range of 50–300 kJ/mol. The gas sample analysis indicated that methane production was peaking at 51.31 vol.%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicThermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesFrench-language works237,207