MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

82 AI-guided spatial profiling of tertiary lymphoid structures in human lung cancer by imaging mass cytometry

2025· article· W4415898748 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Hales, Smriti Kala, D. Mason, James Mansfield, Regan Baird, Hiroyuki Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass cytometryLung cancerHuman lungProfiling (computer programming)Flow cytometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Imaging Mass Cytometry™ (IMC™) technology enables high-dimensional, multiplexed imaging at subcellular resolution without autofluorescence or cyclic imaging. The Hyperion™ XTi Imaging System supports three acquisition modes: Preview Mode (PM), Tissue Mode (TM), and Cell Mode (CM). PM provides rapid whole-slide scans for tissue overview within minutes, while TM captures entire tissue sections at 5-μm resolution, mapping over 40 biomarkers to reveal spatial heterogeneity. CM enables high-resolution, single-cell imaging of regions of interest (ROIs) identified in PM. Together with an automated slide loader, these modes support continuous, high-throughput tissue analysis.Methods Lung cancer tissue sections from an immunotherapy-treated patient were stained with a 34-marker IMC panel, combining the Human Immuno-Oncology IMC Panel and Maxpar IMC Cell Segmentation Kit. Imaging was performed using the Hyperion XTi Imaging System (Standard BioTools). PM was used for initial scanning, followed by automated ROI selection via Phenoplex™ software (Visiopharm®) based on three criteria: (1) tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) expressing CD20 and CD3, (2) Granzyme B-rich regions, and (3) clusters of CD68 and Vimentin double-positive cells. Adjacent serial sections were imaged in TM for whole-slide morphological comparison.Results Tissue segmentation across all modes was performed using a deep-learning AI algorithm trained to identify key features such as vessels and TLS. CM images were analyzed at the single-cell level using iridium DNA-based segmentation. Spatial mapping of the TLS and cellular phenotyping was conducted with the Phenoplex guided workflow. Immune contexture was assessed using t-SNE plots stratified by spatial region and clinical variables.Conclusions This study demonstrates the utility of the Hyperion XTi Imaging System’s multimodal acquisition capabilities in extracting spatial and phenotypic insights from complex tissue samples. The integration of PM, TM, and CM modes with automated ROI selection and AI-driven segmentation enables efficient, high-resolution analysis of immune architecture. The Phenoplex platform facilitates rapid identification and spatial mapping of key cell populations and phenotypes, supporting advanced tissue profiling and biomarker discovery in immuno-oncology research.Ethics Approval This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fukushima Medical University, approval No. 2538.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207