MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

283 Functional profiling of CAR T cells using high-dimensional CyTOF: integrating cytokine, transcription factor and immune checkpoint marker signatures

2025· article· W4415898942 on OpenAlexaff
Ling Wang, David Howell, Deeqa Mahamed

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription factorProfiling (computer programming)Immune systemImmune checkpointTranscription (linguistics)Gene expression profiling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Adoptive immunotherapy using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is a revolutionary treatment in cancer therapy. CAR T therapy has achieved remarkable success in hematological B cell malignancies. However, it has faced significant challenges in solid tumors due to various factors, such as complex tumor microenvironments, restricted trafficking, impersistent antitumor activity and toxicities. A better understanding of CAR T biology will accelerate development of CAR T therapies with improved antitumor efficacy, durability and decreased toxicities.High-parameter cytometry is a powerful tool to functionally characterize CAR T cells at multiple stages of clinical development, from product characterization during manufacturing to longitudinal evaluation of the infused product in patients. Fluorescence-based cytometry faces significant challenges with signal overlap and autofluorescence, limiting sensitivity and the number of targets detected in CAR T cells. Consequently, rare cell populations and functional readouts of CAR T cells are difficult to resolve. CyTOF™ technology overcomes these limitations with low signal spillover and absence of autofluorescence. To minimize technical variation, metal-tagged antibody cocktails and stained cell samples can be frozen for later use and acquisition, enabling a streamlined and flexible workflow in clinical research. Here, we present a 40-plus-marker CyTOF panel to simultaneously analyze phenotypic and functional protein expression in CAR T cells from in vitro co-culture with tumor cells.Methods CD19-targeted CAR T cells were expanded in vitro and co-cultured with Nalm6 cells at an E:T (effector cell: target cell) ratio of 1:3 for 2–4 days. A high-parameter CyTOF panel including 43 surface, cytoplasmic and nuclear markers was used to stain CAR T cells. The co-culture samples collected at different time points were stained using a pre-aliquoted frozen antibody cocktail following surface and intracellular (simultaneous cytoplasmic and nuclear targets) staining procedures. Stained samples were frozen and simultaneously acquired on a CyTOF XT system later.Results The cytotoxicity, activation, proliferation, differentiation and exhaustion of CAR T cells were evaluated. Comprehensive profiling revealed that CAR T cells became activated, proliferated and produced cytokines in in vitro co-culture with tumor cells and exhibited an exhaustive-like Treg phenotype at the end of a four-day co-culture. A diverse polyfunctional antitumor signature in the CD8 TEMRA cell subset was discovered during the co-culture.Conclusions Overall, we demonstrate that the high-parameter CyTOF panel enables deep functional characterization of CAR T cells by simultaneous detection of surface, cytoplasmic and nuclear markers, supporting advancing clinical development of CAR T therapies.For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207