MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Chaundy-Bullard Type Identity and its $q$-analogue

2025· article· W4415904020 on OpenAlex
Wathek Chammam, Mongia Khlifi, Muhammad Gulistan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMajmaah University
KeywordsIdentity (music)Type (biology)Hypergeometric identityHypergeometric functionHypergeometric distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we use the Chaundy-Bullard combinatorial identity to prove some identities involving the Pochhammer k-symbol. In fact, these contribution generalize the results given in the paper [O. Kouba, \emph{ A Chaundy-Bullard type identity involving the Pochhammer symbol}, J. Indagationes Mathematicae 34 (2023) 186-189; Available online at \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indag.2022.10.009]}. We also give some Chaundy-Bullard type identity verified by the generalized hypergeometric series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it